The Vision Council Posted April 9, 2018 Report Share Posted April 9, 2018 On 4/8/2018 at 12:43 PM, Yaron [LaserOp] said: Sorry, accidentally posted the previous one too soon. Full one follows here: Hi Yaron, I deleted the superfluous post. I'll wait for Jullien to respond but perhaps just the example is confusing. I would have thought that the LMS would only send whatever ENGMARK records existed in the PROCBLK so if those other records needed to be included they would have to be in the PROCBLK as well. To my understanding that seems to be the only way to be consistent with other record handling. What am I missing? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.